Brian and Jon— What’s next?

Good times

Good times in happier days

I met Brian Williams in person just once. I don’t watch network news, so ten years ago I knew little more about him than his name. Now, remembering his talk, two things stand out: his insistence on his integrity and his easy humor. He told us — journalism students — that impartiality was so important for a reporter that he never advocated for either political party and that even his family didn’t know how he voted. The juxtaposition of his two personas, the serious news anchor and the easy-going comic, made an unforgettable impression on me. Since then, he’s made many appearances with entertainers, showing off his comic talent. Will he exploit both of his personas and figure how to deliver the news in a novel way? It’s been said that Jon Stewart was invited to host “Meet the Press.” Could Williams host the “Daily Show”?

I couldn’t come down on one side or the other about how Williams’s fanciful reporting of his experiences as a reporter should be handled. At first I thought that his saying he was not just in the line of fire in Iraq, but actually fired upon, was a transgression that compromised his integrity, that he really couldn’t continue to report the news from his lofty perch. But I knew that if NBC let Williams go, no one else could take him. His newscasting career would be definitely over. That didn’t seem right or fair.

I evolved.

I knew that his embellishments — all right, lies — were more to aggrandize himself than to distort what he saw and reported, that he had caused no harm to anyone at the time. After being so respected for so many years, was it really necessary for him to pay such a high price for his vanity?

David Brooks, with whom I often disagree, wrote a thoughtful and convincing column today. “There’s something sad in Brian Williams’s need to puff up his Iraq adventures,” he wrote,

and something barbaric in the public response.

A sort of coliseum culture takes over, leaving no place for mercy.

The civic fabric would be stronger if, instead of trying to sever relationships with those who have done wrong, we tried to repair them, if we tried forgiveness instead of exiling.

By forgiving, after a convincing mea culpa by the offender, the critics are actually better off, because the meanness of their vengeance is averted, Brooks reasons. The offender is cleansed by his confession and healing can take place on both sides.

“Being caught is punishment enough,” opined Jon Stewart. Leave it to him to cut right to the core. Why is the press making so much ado about what is nothing compared to its unquestioning acquiescence to the Iraq War? On the same day that NBC announced it was suspending Williams for six months without pay and Stewart announced that he is leaving the “Daily Show,” Stewart commented with heavy irony,

Finally, someone is being held to account for misleading America about the Iraq war. It might not necessarily be the first person you’d want held accountable on that list. But never again will Brian Williams mislead this great nation about being shot at in a war we probably wouldn’t have ended up in if the media had applied this level of scrutiny to the actual f*cking war.

And that’s the truth. We will miss you both. But not for long, I think.

 

5 Comments

Filed under Journalism

5 responses to “Brian and Jon— What’s next?

  1. Ben

    I have to disagree with David Brooks. I think the public can and does behave civilly towards the truly remorseful. But a braggart and his half-spin/half-apology? Williams deserves the “colosseum culture”.

    • I’ve been thinking about what you said, Ben. Can we be sure that Williams is a braggart, that he deliberately lied? I’m not so sure. See my followup post, Misremembering is real.

      • Ben

        Hi Diane. I don’t question mis-remembering. But I do question the propriety of having a “serial mis-rememberer” delivering the news from what should be the pinnacle of truth. I’m tired of the explanations about memory, because I feel they deflect from the real problem here: that if Williams is afflicted by a flawed memory, he doesn’t belong in the news chair. But fair enough, point taken. Maybe he’s not a braggart (I happen to think he is) but rather a victim of flawed memory.

  2. Pingback: Misremembering is real | V B I

  3. Hi Ben. Has it been established that Williams is a “serial mis-rememberer”? I shared your feelings until I read that false memory is not only real but very common. I am not a regular viewer of NBC NIghtly News, but when I did catch Williams, his gravity and professionalism, coupled with his droll humor, set him apart. I do agree that if it can be shown that he exaggerated or embellished the truth, then he doesn’t belong in the anchor’s chair. Maybe I’m naïve, but I can’t believe that he deliberately falsified the truth, i.e., lied. And as has now been pointed out many times, a far graver fault is the failure to hold the White House to the fire when it was trumpeting lies about Iraq in order to drag us into a war that the oilmen needed to establish and control a secure source of oil.

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s